The Peter Moores revolution will be a 
gradual and balanced one, focused on creating a more confident, 
self-sustaining culture for English cricket 
English cricket feels as if it is out of kilter and so, like England 
invariably does at such times, it is searching for consensus. Do you 
want to know what the future of English cricket will look like? "Like 
most things it's about balance," 
 Peter Moores said. It will not get any more revolutionary than that.
Somewhere at the centre of this rebalancing exercise is a search for 
Englishness, a yearning not to follow the mindset of football and regard
 foreign intervention as automatically superior - imagine the scathing 
response if an English manager, even a highly successful one, sought to 
develop an egotistical persona like Jose Mourinho - but to create a 
feeling of national unity and pride in the manner that 
Stuart Lancaster has achieved with England's rugby union side.
Defining Englishness is hard enough. The Australians believe in their 
courage and resilience and the mystical properties of the Baggy Green, 
India draws strength from the passion and the wealth that cricket 
creates. But since the Empire retreated into history and present-day 
pomp and pageantry, for many, became largely a way to bring the tourists
 in, England has struggled to construct a true, living, sense of 
national identity. 
Englishness seems to be about irony, self-effacement, pragmatism and, 
increasingly, the right to individuality. As Jeremy Paxman wrote in The English: "It is based on values that are so deeply embedded in the culture that it is almost unconscious." 
None of these values fit easily with success in team sport. But after a 
decade of reliance upon southern African coaches - and the ordered, 
prescriptive ways of Duncan Fletcher and Andy Flower brought many 
benefits - and also importing players with a powerful South African 
yearning to succeed, it is the aim of Moores, his self-effacing captain,
 
Alastair Cook,
 and the MD of England cricket, Paul Downton, who has spent much of his 
life since retirement in the rarefied world of the City, to find a way 
to do it.
One thing there will be, says Moores, in an England dressing room 
overseen by himself and his assistant Paul Farbrace, is a recognition 
that there are times to lighten the mood.
"Losing is tough - this winter would have been tough," he said. 
"Sometimes the time when the pressure is at the most extreme is when you
 want to be at your lightest. The general rule for me is when the 
pressure is on you try to take it off and when there's none there you 
shove it on."
Gradually, we are learning about Moores' England. As far as the coaching
 and support staff is concerned, the broad church will remain - it is 
just that they won't all be trying to cram into the pulpit. 
Moores knows that knowledge is essential, but he reasserted, too, that 
there comes a time when it is understood that it is down to 11 players 
to have the talent and self-reliance and, yes, a powerful sense not just
 of individual ambition but of national pride, to go out and do their 
stuff.
This might not be revolutionary, but it is common sense. Moores' English
 revolution will not be jingoistic. Not for a moment will it overlook 
the importance of planning: essentially that is where his coaching 
excellence lies. But when the preparation is over, the overriding 
purpose will be to restate the notion that the togetherness that matters
 is that of the 11 players on the field.
"My basic rule of thumb on most things is that when you are preparing, a
 big resource of coaches is fine," Moores said, "but when you are 
actually playing you have to be careful there aren't too many people 
around because the players forget to connect to each other. 
"The most important thing is that you play as a team - 11 blokes go and 
play against the opposition - coaches don't play the game. So you don't 
want the player connecting to a coach or multiple coaches rather than 
his team-mates. 
"The job is that the players unite to play the game: and they deliver, 
they come off, they talk with each other. They have to be savvy and 
brave as players and they have to work that out amongst themselves to 
get out there and play. It is a balance of both - good coaching to help 
with preparation and then players playing."
Graham Gooch 
left on Thursday,
 replaced under the "freshen things up" mantra, perceived perhaps as a 
bit long in the tooth, a bit uninspiring, the fact that he is mentor to 
Cook unable to save him. He took his dog thrower with him, although it 
is unlikely he is ready yet to use it solely to throw balls for dogs.
But even Gooch is not being dispensed with entirely. "He still has great
 relationships with some of the batters and he plays golf with them so 
his bank of knowledge isn't going to disappear," Moores said. The same 
goes for Richard Halsall, the fielding coach, whose role will now 
largely be undertaken by the new assistant coach, Paul Farbrace. But 
Halsall will be on call, his expertise utilised from time to time.
 |  | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 |  | 
 | "I hope we connect to the public so they see what we are trying to do. 
We want to put forward what's happening with the England team, how the 
lads are portraying themselves, how they are playing and portray that 
the future is more exciting than the past"
Head coach Peter Moores | 
 |  | 
| 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
Others, such as Phil Neale, the England team manager, and Mark Bawden, 
the psychologist, might also be nervously awaiting a phone call in the 
coming days. Neale, who will be 60 in June, has been with the team since
 1999 and has a reputation for ensuring things run smoothly behind the 
scenes, while Bawden's standing was strong until the Ashes but took a 
knock after the obvious mental disintegration of several of the squad on
 that tour.
Less than a week away from his first match in charge - a potential pit 
trap against Scotland in Aberdeen - Moores has also become the first 
England coach to distance himself from a cookbook. 
When England issued their 
dietary requirements
 ahead of the Ashes tour in Australia last winter, the recipes 
themselves, taken in isolation, could not be faulted in nutritional 
terms - not even the quinoa, cranberry and feta salad. But to deliver a 
70-page glossy cookbook in such an overbearing fashion suggested that 
England's ever-growing investment in a vast support staff charged with 
achieving marginal gains had begun to lose sight of reality.
"Like most things it's about balance," Moores said. "You look at 
everything to see if it's still in balance and redress any imbalances. 
If it has become too sciencey you wouldn't want to go all the way back 
to just gut feeling - you would sit somewhere in the middle and pay 
attention to both.  Food, having a beer, relaxing: you balance them all.
 Crikey, they are normal people and they have to able to enjoy 
themselves.  They don't want to eat boiled chicken every day. 
"I obviously wasn't there, I was eating Lancashire hotpot. But the 
players we have - everyone knows what you should and shouldn't have and 
what affects you, you have a job to do and to stay in good shape."
So a relaxation of sorts then, but no suggestion that he go so far as to
 take a leave out of Nigel Farage's book and base his methodology on 
posing with a pint whenever a cameraman is in the vicinity.
Moores knows that he takes over with disenchantment running high among 
many England supporters. There were complaints about a disconnect 
between the England team and the public long before the 5-0 Ashes 
whitewash.
The subsequent removal of Kevin Pietersen is still resented by the vast 
majority - 75% according to one large, if unscientific, ESPNcricinfo 
poll - of the English cricketing public. He was a maverick, a grating 
personality for some, a malcontent when things went badly, removed to 
make the job of Moores and Cook easier, a salutary reminder while we are
 considering the English national character that hypocrisy is never too 
far away.
"I hope we connect to the public so they see what we are trying to do," 
Moores said. "It is really important, I think, that Kev can have his 
say, but we want to put forward what's happening with the England team, 
how the lads are portraying themselves, how they are playing and portray
 that as more exciting - that the future is more exciting than the 
past."
In a perfect world that future would no longer be overly reliant on 
southern African imports or on merely the cricketing skills taught in a 
privileged English private education. With the help of a drive to keep 
cricket 
relevant in the inner cities,
 the continued influence of forces for change such as Chance to Shine 
and, who knows, perhaps even a more successful domestic Twenty20 
tournament, the future could touch talented young cricketers in all 
parts of society.
In this new England what would Moores' message be? The answer was less 
prescriptive than many answers we have become used to in recent years.
"If I had a message to a young player it would be 'Come with your own 
mind. Imagine what you could try and do and then go and do it.'"
David Hopps is the UK editor of ESPNcricinfo
 Feeds: David Hopps
 Feeds: David Hopps