
On April 29, Adam Silver, the commissioner of the National Basketball 
Association (NBA) imposed a lifetime ban and a $2.5 million fine on the 
oldest team owner in the league - Donald Sterling of the Los Angeles 
Clippers - who was found using "deeply offensive and hurtful language" 
towards Afro-Americans. Silver announced the ban, unprecedented in the 
history of American sport, within four days of starting investigations.
 
The speed, weight  and transparency of Silver's decisions took the 
sports world by surprise and led, in India, to talk of what the IPL 
could learn from it to reach that level of executive efficiency. One 
radical thought came from the IPL's founder and former chairman Lalit 
Modi: set up an autonomous body to run the IPL, independent of the BCCI.
Modi, who has begun his return to Indian cricket administration with a controversial and contested 
election
 as RCA president, was inspired in setting up the IPL by borrowing ideas
 from well-established models including the NBA, Major League Baseball 
and the Formula 1. 
 
"I would remove the IPL from under the BCCI and put it in the hands of a
 separate company," Modi told ESPNcricinfo. "They can have the 
ownership, let them earn the revenue but allow autonomy to the 
independent company. Bring in professionals that have nothing else but 
to run the IPL."
It is important, Modi said, to involve the primary stakeholders - the 
franchise owners - in the decision-making process. "The league's board 
would have franchise owners on it. And the company would then send in an
 annual report to the BCCI. That is how it should be. The owners need to
 have a big say in it. You cannot have a system that keeps changing 
rules like retention to suit one's own needs," Modi said.
It is a moot point, though, whether the BCCI would want to divest power 
into the hands of an independent authority or even equip a chairman or 
appoint a commissioner who could have complete powers as Silver enjoys 
in the NBA. Tim Wright, who was CEO of the former IPL franchise Deccan 
Chargers in 2009, said Modi's suggestion would not be bought by the 
BCCI.
"The IPL could not have been created without BCCI money, without the 
state associations' stadia and many other things," Wright said. "Would 
the BCCI be willing to reduce its ability to control the IPL and by so 
doing, reduce its ability to control the India national team? Of course 
it is not."
Wright, who has worked previously with IMG, raised the example of 
Formula 1, where the administrative and financial or commercial powers 
are split between two bodies. 
"The Federation Internationale de l'Automobile governs the rules but the
 commercial side of the sport is owned and run by a private equity 
firm," Wright said. "The chief executive of Formula One is independent 
of the governing body and the teams. 
"The BCCI's only motive to do something similar would be to crystallise 
the brand value of IPL, as Formula One has done, but I do not see that 
as imminent or likely even in the medium or long term because of the 
BCCI's broader interest and role in the sport." 
Modi also advocated a "strong person" at the helm of the IPL: "You need 
to address the issue, take the bull by the horns, and do what needs to 
be done" 
Wright, too, pointed out that the franchise agreements give the BCCI's 
chairman the power to shape the key relationship between the IPL teams 
and BCCI. "That the chairman should be free of influence from any one 
team seems obvious," Wright said.
The IPL has long suffered from a lack of leadership. In 2008, when Modi 
was the league chairman, the BCCI constitution was amended to allow N 
Srinivasan, then the board secretary, to have a stake in a franchise. 
Modi now concedes he had made a mistake but believes the Mudgal 
Commission, which was appointed by the Supreme Court to investigate 
mismanagement of an earlier BCCI probe verifying allegations of 
corruption during the 2013 edition of the tournament, will correct that 
mistake.
Silver followed up his action against Sterling by making public the NBA 
constitution, so long available only within the league. It's worth 
noting that neither the BCCI's constitution nor its annual accounts are 
accessible to the public. That might be a good place to start.
   
Nagraj Gollapudi is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo
 Feeds: Nagraj Gollapudi
© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.