Monday, May 12, 2014

IPL schedule reveals BCCI home truths


Children supported by the initiative 'Education for all' at the Wankhede Stadium, Mumbai Indians v Pune Warriors, IPL 2013, Mumbai, April 13, 2013
The defending IPL champions will not get to host the IPL final this time © BCCI
Enlarge
 The allotment of venues for IPL matches is predominantly a political game between the BCCI and its associations; the recent shuffle of the playoffs' hosts suggests as much

On Sunday night, Kolkata Knight Riders played an 'away' game against Kings XI Punjab in Cuttack. On Wednesday, they will return to the venue for a 'home' game. It's just one of those quirks of scheduling that seem to fit right into the IPL's nomadic format. Elections, court cases, international politics have all affected the allotment of venues in the tournament, which of late has become a tool for political manoeuvring within the BCCI - most evident in the recent changes to the venues of the IPL playoffs, including the final.
The announcement of the original IPL schedule of the India leg hinted that the venues had been finalised keeping an eye on the September election of the BCCI; recent changes, including Saturday's announcement of the shifting of the playoff matches and the final, have only firmed up that belief, with several politically significant state bodies having been showered with multiple IPL games.
For a state body, hosting an IPL match is as financially rewarding as it is prestigious. Each member unit earns approximately Rs 2 crore from the BCCI for staging an IPL game. Add to that the variable sums that are charged for letting out practice facilities to the home teams, and the state bodies' desperation to host IPL matches is understandable.
The original IPL schedule had ensured that two of stood-down BCCI president N Srinivasan's most trusted lieutenants from the east zone - Orissa and Jharkhand bosses Ranjib Biswal and Amitabh Choudhary - had been awarded IPL games, completely out of turn. Ranchi and Chennai are located at two different corners of the country. So are Chandigarh and Cuttack. Still, Ranchi - hometown of Chennai Super Kings captain MS Dhoni - was originally awarded two of Super Kings' home games, and then got two more when the Tamil Nadu Cricket Association conveyed its inability to host any games this season.
Cuttack's Barabati Stadium, meanwhile, was awarded two of Kings XI Punjab's home matches, and got one more when Kolkata Knight Riders' home game on May 14 had to be moved from Eden Gardens - thus making it perhaps the first ground to act as an adopted 'home' of two teams in the same season. Why are Biswal and Choudhary - and their home grounds - significant? Both are supporters from the east zone of the ruling faction led by Srinivasan and hold top positions in the BCCI. While Biswal is the IPL chairman, Choudhary heads the powerful BCCI marketing committee.
The key, though, is that it is the east zone's turn this year to nominate a president for three years from October 2014. The BCCI constitution allows the candidate to be from outside the east zone if he is nominated by an east zone member and seconded by another.
And so matches and venues are used as carrots and sticks. If Cuttack and Ranchi benefited from their proximity to the power centre, venues that came under BCCI officials critical of Srinivasan and his tenure were left out in the cold.
Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh and Vidarbha had informed the BCCI that there would be no problem in playing IPL matches at their respective venues anytime after the date of voting. However, the BCCI turned a blind eye on the associations of Ajay Shirke, the Maharashtra Cricket Association president who had resigned as BCCI treasurer protesting against the handling of the IPL corruption scandal; Jyotiraditya Scindia, the MPCA head who was the first to question Srinivasan after the corruption scandal broke last year, and Manohar from Vidarbha, the most vocal detractor of Srinivasan after Modi.
The case of Mumbai, which lost the final to Bangalore, is more complex. In the original schedule, the IPL had followed the set norm of allotting the last two games, including the final, to the home ground of the defending champion. Saturday's announcement of the change offered no explanation for it, and there has been none since - the truth will probably be hard to explain. The main factor has been the prevailing acrimony between the MCA and the BCCI hierarchy.
Sharad Pawar's return as the MCA chief last October has made the ruling regime in the BCCI wary of the MCA. To add to that, ever since Pawar's return, Ravi Savant, the MCA and BCCI vice-president, has time and again questioned the BCCI decisions in the public domain. Pawar's public criticism of the suspension of the Rajasthan Cricket Association on May 6 is being considered the key reason that led to the change of the venue for the final.
Mumbai's loss has been Bangalore's gain. But Bangalore hasn't benefitted only due to its ostensibly luxurious hospitality boxes. Five months ago, the power centres in the Karnataka State Cricket Association experienced a shift from Anil Kumble's group to Brijesh Patel's. Since then, the BCCI top brass has been doling out all sorts of favours to the new KSCA regime. The team managers for India's last two overseas assignments - the Asia Cup and the World Twenty20 - were both KSCA representatives, and the allotment of the final is being seen as yet another step by BCCI top brass led still led by the sidelined N Srinivasan to keep a key south zone member happy.
Similarly, allotting an IPL playoff game each to the Cricket Club of India's Brabourne Stadium and Eden Gardens are seen as measures to keep two more voting members on the right side ahead of the BCCI elections in September.
Awarding IPL games to units close to the president isn't new. The DY Patil Sports Stadium, a private stadium in Navi Mumbai, hosted two IPL finals, thanks to its owners' close links with Modi, the then IPL chairman, and Pawar, who was the BCCI president when the IPL was launched. Similarly, when Deccan Chargers had to play their home games away from Hyderabad in 2010, Nagpur - the home city of then BCCI president Shashank Manohar - was one of the three home venues of the franchise.
Similarly, Kochi Tuskers Kerala played two of their home games in Indore, the cricketing base of the Madhya Pradesh Cricket Association, in their only season. Sanjay Jagdale, the most influential personality from MP cricket, was then the BCCI joint-secretary and soon took over as the secretary. Before this season, Dharamsala, the home of BCCI joint-secretary Anurag Thakur, was the favoured adopted home of Kings XI Punjab.
Amol Karhadkar is a correspondent at ESPNcricinfo
RSS Feeds: Amol Karhadkar
© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

0 comments:

Post a Comment