"They should be given a fine and then a stern warning stating that (if) 
once more then it could be double the penalty and even a match ban," 
Shastri told ESPNcricinfo. When asked whether increasing monetary 
sanctions alone could prevent a breach of the IPL's rules, Shastri 
remained confident. "It could. It is in the hands of the match referee. 
But I would tell the player that next time if you even come close (to a 
breach) you will face serious consequences."
Shastri provided the example of the "stiff" $50,000 fine imposed on then Rajasthan Royals captain Shane Warne
 during the 2011 IPL for breaching the playing contract. Warne had 
allegedly verbally abused the then Rajasthan Cricket Association 
secretary Sanjay Dixit, and a disciplinary panel comprising former IPL 
chairman Chirayu Amin and Shastri imposed the penalty. "The penalties 
can be pretty stiff. We penalised Warne an amount which amounted to his 
match fee for a match.  He was on a $700,000 contract with Rajasthan 
Royals. Tell me one player who has been fined $50,000 anywhere."
Shastri, who also sits on the IPL's code of behaviour committee and the 
technical committee, said that no advisory has been issued to match 
referees in light of the Pollard-Starc incident since the officials were
 aware of the rules. "That is the match referee's jurisdiction. Only 
after they take a decision do we have a right to comment."
The IPL's handling of the incident has once again reopened the debate 
about whether slow over-rates are more important to the league than bad 
behaviour and attract more fines because of the impact on TV 
programming. Shastri rubbished the notion and said that the IPL had set a
 better example than anybody else, including the ICC, when it came to 
penalising tardy over-rates. "Slow over-rates slow the pace of the game 
and captains are appropriately fined. No other cricket body in the world
 takes so strong (an action) as the IPL. Even the ICC can take a leaf 
out of the IPL."
Shastri had earlier expressed his annoyance at Pollard and Starc's behavior in his Times of India
 column. "This one went beyond bad behavior," Shastri wrote. "You can 
joust, tease, stare, have a spat, give a send-off and all that can still
 be tolerated, but you can't almost come to blows. It bordered on 
violence, luckily without anything untoward happening. Both aimed to 
hurt each other with bat and ball. The faults by both are many - 
disrespect to umpires, abuse of equipment, utter disregard for the name 
of their employers, contempt for sponsors and injuring the spirit of the
 game itself. 
"Starc likes to provoke. We all watched him give a mouthful to Virender 
Sehwag after his short ball had rammed the opener on the helmet and gone
 to the fence. Even that is tolerable in small doses. Pollard was 
nothing if not physical. Both need to be spoken to with a stern warning 
and not just a fine."
The altercation began with an exchange of words after Starc bowled a 
bouncer to Pollard in the 17th over of Mumbai Indians' innings against 
Royal Challengers Bangalore. Pollard pulled away as Starc ran in for the
 next delivery, but the bowler continued and bowled the ball at 
Pollard's body. In response, Pollard threatened to throw his bat at 
Starc, but it fell close to the batsman. Andy Pycroft, the match 
referee, fined Pollard 75% and Starc 50% of their match fees.
The bad behaviour in the match, Shastri wrote, wasn't just confined to Pollard and Starc.
"In the same game, [Yuzvendra] Chahal was also involved in a pronounced 
send-off to the batsman he dismissed," Shastri wrote. "It was Chahal's 
good luck that Yuvraj Singh was at hand to humour the offended on-field 
umpires. Mostly it's the bowlers who are stepping out of line. 
"All the stakeholders must clamp down on such behaviour. It doesn't 
improve you as a cricketer much less as a human being. It's been a 
splendid IPL so far and it deserves better from its performers."
 






0 comments:
Post a Comment